Malaika Hall
English/per.3
April 29th
2014
Socratic Seminar #1 Final Reflection
In our
first Socratic Seminar for the novel 1984 we had a great introduction to the
story. While I generally kept my own opinion my peers showed me new ways to
look at Winston and his slow path to rebellion. I was even forced to think of
things I hadn’t such as the “broken elevator” symbolizing the broken promises
in the government. This opened many ideas about things such as all the
contradiction in the names of the many “ministries”. There are ministries of
peace and truth where the purposes of these ministries are actually the
opposite. My peers even helped me to strengthen my previous ideas. For example
the “Big Brother” party purposely-targeting young children to build their own
generation of loyal subjects. The party was very manipulative and focused on
eliminating the need to think for yourself.
The statement that the all-seeing
government forced people not to trust themselves or others was very accurate to
me. Winston stated how he hated people he was attracted to and was anxious
about the connection he felt with O’Brien. Many people were so concerned with
being aligned with the laws of the government that it became hard to actually
have friends or trust anyone. I disagreed with the statement that Winston was
consciously attempting to rebel against the government through his journal. I
believe that he was simply trying to express his feelings that had been bottled
up for a long time.
Being able to make our own
questions worked really well for the seminar. We were able to talk about the
things we thought were the most important. More importantly parts of the book
we really understood and could connect with. This allowed us to have a deeper
conversation.
While making our own questions was
helpful it also limited us in a way. Both groups had very similar questions and
this showed in the second group. Also a better distribution of people would be helpful.
There was a clear difference between the first and second group where the first
conversation was more interesting and heated. A better distribution of people
may influence other to speak up more and be apart of the conversation.